Tag Archives: Nostradamus & terrorism

Toulouse Gunman is Europe’s Wake Up Call


I posted this article in late March, 2012. The warning is still intact. This is no time to fall asleep at the wheel and think everything is okay, fine and dandy. There might not have been many terrorist attacks in France lately, but Nostradamus wrote words that bring about awareness of Toulouse. Toulouse is in the Occitania region (where Occitan once was spoken by all), on the banks of the Garonne River, which flows to Bordeaux and the Gironde estuary at the Atlantic (Bay of Biscay). All of these places are prophesied to be where an intense battle will be waged, once the End Times war begins and Europe is invaded by Muslim and Eastern European soldiers.

Toulouse is a city, rather than a commune, like most places in France are small towns and villages. It is the fourth largest city in France, after Paris, Marseille, and Lyon. It is in southwestern France, close to the Pyrenees Mountains and the Mediterranean Sea. Thus, it is a strategic place that will be attacked.

The aspect of terrorism can be seen as a ploy. It is a method of attack done by those too weak to declare war on another and do like the USA and USSR used to do (saber-rattling). When one uses terrorist to declare war on the United States, as Osama bin Laden did in 2001, they become an enemy that is under-estimated. Like the greatest victories of the Roman Empire, Napoleon, Rommel, Robert E. Lee, and others, you draw a superior army into a trap, where an inferior army can totally destroy the larger. Acts of terrorism are these distractions that lead nations like France to think the Muslims are nothing more than annoying.

This is why this warning should be reviewed again, now, when the world is inching closer and closer to something big breaking. Will it be Israel versus Iran? Will it be Russia versus Europe (with Ukraine taken)? Will it be Republicans versus Democrats? Nobody is watching out for Osama bin Laden versus the whole Christian world, which is what Nostradamus prophesied.

But, Osama bin Laden is dead, right? Barack Hussein Obama said so.

With that said, here is the snooze alarm going off once again. Annoying, isn’t it?

—–

In the news the past few weeks was an ongoing situation in France.  A gunman had methodically and regularly shot and killed innocent people.  He would show up on a motorcycle (something very commonly driven in France), wearing a face-covering helmet, and then begin shooting.  He did this every four days for two weeks, and the French police had a suspect they surrounded before he could kill again on schedule.  He died last Thursday (March 22, 2012), falling out of a window.  Here is one news report: Police: Islamic gunman in French standoff dead after jumping from window.

Just the other day, after one French authority stated, “”Lone wolves are formidable adversaries,” the home the gunman lived in was searched.  It was found to have a rather advanced cache of weapons.  Before the gunman was cornered, and before it was publicly announced that he was Muslim, I heard one of the cable “news” talking heads theorize the opinion that the gunman might be similar to the crazy Norway gunman, who killed over 85 innocent people in July 2011.  That gunman had written a manifesto that stated his actions were in response to the Islamic problem that he saw escalating in Europe and Scandinavia.  However, after the French announced their gunman was probably a Muslim, his religious beliefs shed more light on several elements that make him different from the Norway gunman.

First, France is (or has been) an ally of America, particularly in the War on Terror, which is against al-Qaeda.  France has sent troops to be stationed in Middle Eastern war zones, albeit mainly for show.  The murder of French military personnel (paratroopers) is a statement about France being targeted by Islamic organizations, who use individuals to create shock value as part of their overall plan.  Osama bin Laden released a public threat to France, roughly 5 months before he was “killed” (here is the report of that threat January 22, 2011).

Second, the cold-blooded murder of a Jewish father and rabbi, but more importantly two Jewish children, is clearly a statement about Islam being at war against Jews, because of their occupation of Palestine.  Many Muslims have made that threat publicly (“death to Israel”), with the last being Iranian President Ahmadinejad (his latest public words were published on July 20, 2011).

Third, the cache of weapons found in the gunman’s home, which included a Russian assault rifle and a Uzi machine pistol, is a sign that the ever-popular “one lone gunman” theory does not hold water (does it ever? Read the article in the link, which raises some important questions: Chicago Tribune).  As strong as French law is preventing arms sales, one would think that the gunman would know he could not use more than a couple of handguns, as many ammunition clips as could be easily carried, a Bell helmet, and a motorcycle.

So, beyond somehow being able to amass highly controlled weapons, why would he not simply ask a friend to hang onto the arsenal “while I go out on a bike ride for an hour or so”?  If they are hard to get, why just let them be confiscated?

All of those elements are significant as they fit what Nostradamus prophesied in The Prophecies. As evidence of this threat to France, I wrote the book The $25-Million Answer: How Nostradamus Told Where to Look.  He told where to look for Osama bin Laden, in case you never read the book.  That book began as a simple search for one repeated term found in The Prophecies, which was basically the French word for “mountain” (various spellings).  That word most frequently connected directly to the proper name “Pyrenees” (various spellings), which are the mountains that create the border between France and Spain.

The story I found in the “mountain” quatrains told of a “mountain man” who would seek asylum in the Pyrenees (bin Laden).  He would go there for the purpose of building a secretly trained army, one which would be used to assist in a naval invasion (another part of an overall secret plan) of Mediterranean Europe (Italy, France, and Spain).  I wrote that book between November 2010 and February 2011, publishing it in March 2011.

It is important to realize that a secret army would need to have many small sites to store weapons, like homes and apartments held by your Muslim men.  What else would one expect?  That means finding a valuable cache in one Muslim’s home is not the exception, but the rule.  I imagine the French police would prefer the extremists build one large armory and put out signs that say, “Danger: Islamic Terrorist Armory, Trespassers Will Be Shot.”  Unfortunately, that will never be the case, which makes the story of the arsenal found in Toulouse ,France important.

Toulouse is in the southwestern of France, in the regions that mesh together known as Languedoc-Roussillon and Midi-Pyrenees.  It was once the capitol of the historic province known as Languedoc, but it is now the capitol of the Midi-Pyrenees region.  The Midi-Pyrenees region has the Pyrenees Mountains as its southern border.  Notice the overlap in these diagrams.

Nostradamus specifically lists Toulouse, France in his quatrains.  He lists that place ten times, which is a significant number.  He also lists other places in the Languedoc region, as well as the Aquitaine region (meshing with Toulouse to the west).  Southwest France will be the site of some major battles, according to Nostradamus.

Like the preponderance of appearances of “mountains” (various spellings), the preponderance of the appearances of “Toulouse” (various spellings) needs to be noted, especially when important events occur there (as happened last week).  When one sees a word that is neither an article (a, an, or the) or preposition (of, by, for, with, to, in, etc.), a significant number of appearances makes those quatrains stand up and link together to tell a story.  Such a story is usually stretched over a period of years, with many linking events, and thus not a wham-bam-thank-you-ma’am clear prediction of one event to look for.  In my book, one sees how the decade Osama bin Laden spent in hiding was not written into only one quatrain.  This means the story that focuses on Toulouse is not simply about one “lone wolf gunman” being found to have a cache of weapons stashed away there.  It means the cache fits into the long-term story told.

In reference to Toulouse, France, Wikipedia states that it has, “1,202,889 inhabitants as of 1 January 2008, [making] the Toulouse metropolitan area the fourth-largest in France, after Paris (12.1 million), Lyon (2.1 million), and Marseille (1.7 million).”  Marseille is another city mentioned a number of times, and it is about 200 miles east of Toulouse.  Toulouse is only 50 miles (roughly) north of the border the Pyrenees range forms.  The Midi-Pyrenees region is overall very sparsely populated; meaning once one is outside the major population areas, like Toulouse, one is able to move about with very little notice.  This makes it a very convenient major city in southern France, from which supplies and staples can easily be obtained, enough to sustain an army of say 10,000 Islamic extremists.

I have written quite thoroughly in The $25-Million Answer how there is local support for those “visitors” who seek to take down a major European power, one perceived as suppressing the voices of locals seeking autonomy and freedom.  It is important to read my book as it addresses the Basque and French Catalonians histories more deeply.  It makes it possible to see how people need to stop getting on their knees and praying to the god Obama, thanking him for having saved the world by killing Osama bin Laden.  That event might just be some poor body double tossed into the Indian Ocean, and not who the press said it was.  I offer my book through my website for only $10, plus shipping costs; but it is available through major Internet booksellers, such as Amazon and Barnes & Noble.  How much is being forearmed worth? Still, when I wrote that book, I did not know there would be this tidbit of news coming from Toulouse.

One quatrain that I see now, one of the ten total with “Toulouse” stated (VIII-30), has the main theme line say, “Dedans Tholoze non loing de Belvezer,” which literally states, “Within Toulouse not long from Belvezer”.  Belvezer is another place in France, also in the Midi-Pyrenees region, northwest of Toulouse.  Line two then states, “Faisant un puys loing, palais despectacle,” which literally translates to say, “Packing (or Bundling) one mountains (or hills/or subsequently) far off, palate (or palace) disdained (or of spectacle).”  Line three than states, “Tresor trouvé un chacun ira vexer,” which literally translates to say, “Treasure found one every man will go to torment,”.  Line four then states, “Et en deux locs tout & pres del vasacle.”  This literally translates to say, “Both upon two places all & near to the (unknown word, but following the Spanish combo article-preposition “del,” the word “Vasco” means “Basque,” making “vasacle” possibly reflecting that area of the Pyrenees).”

When one focuses only on the capitalized words of this quatrains (capitalization means greater importance), the thread leads from “Within” to “Toulouse,” and from that to “Belvezer.”  That makes the main theme become a central focus on the Midi-Pyrenees region.

Line two is then focused on the present participle of the verb “to pack,” or “to bundle,” which places importance on one “Packing” to go to Toulouse (the gunman’s body is to be sent to his native Algeria).

Line three is then centrally focused on a “Treasure,” which can be seen as supportive to the main theme line (line 1), such that the “Treasure” is found in southern France.

Line four than places its central focus on the word “Et,” which is the conjunction “And,” but also is used to indicate “Both.”  As the supporting line to the secondary theme statement (line 2), “Both” seems to indicate the assistance of someone other than the “lone wolf” scenario would allow.  If the word “vasacle” is a variation of the word Basque, as one of Basque Country (in Spain, seeking independence and autonomy), then “Packing” would indicate a first relocation to the Pyrenees, and then a relocation to Toulouse.  It could make Belvezer a place to be aware of.

This fits the model of a Islamic extremist soldier, one who has been shipped around the world “Packing” the gear of the military (a cache of weapons).  If the word “vasacle” is seen as a variation of “vesicle” (geologically a hollow place formed in lava, and thus having the potential to represent a “cave”), then this fits the model of The $25-Million Answer.

While this quatrain does not have to represent one mad gunman that is now deceased, that lone wolf lunatic can act as a sign of a blister (vesicle), in all its metaphorical ways.  He can be seen as the tip of an iceberg.  It is time to wake up and smell the danger, as it is all about.  Because it is happening in France does not mean it is safe in Great Britain or the United States.  While storming the Pyrenees is not the answer to the problem, it is time to take The Prophecies as a serious warning to take to heart.

Leave a comment

Filed under Nostradamus

If you think you are Charlie, you might want to think again


Back in January 2015 there was a terrorist shooting that was an attack on the Paris office of the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo, due to them publishing cartoons of Muhmmad (a no no). Twelve staff and police were killed, with two brothers killed in a shootout with police a couple of days later.

To show support for the magazine and solidarity against terrorism, there was an “I am Charlie” (Je suis Charlie) posters made up and passed around. That scared the Muslim so badly, several other terrorist attacks took place in France (one significantly in Marseille, which is full of illegal immigrants). Then, there was the truck killing many French people celebrating Bastille Day in Nice. So much for using a poster as a defensive shield.

We are Charlie

From what I read now, the “I am Charlie” translates like “I am Wally,” which is the French version of “Where’s Waldo?” There he is! He’s seeking safety in numbers, but he is unarmed and easy prey.”

The French do not have a history as people that scare others. They were afraid of Napoleon. They surrender quickly; so it is not a good idea to support cartoonists that draw satirical pictures of religious enemies that have proved they will kill people like that. Stop carrying paper signs and strap French revolvers and holsters around your waists. According to The Prophecies of Nostradaus, that will be better than acting like French snobs in the face of real danger.

With this reminder, this is what I posted when I saw how ridiculous the “I am Charlie” movement was a decade ago …

—–

The recent news of al-Qaeda terrorists killing and being killed in Paris is yet another sign of prophecy.  This is not the beginning, but it maintains a flow towards an end, announcing that the worst is still to come.  The world has been shown pictures of thousands of people filling a public square, candles lit and holding signs, while politicians stand by, arm in arm, boasting of standing strong against terrorism.  France’s prime minister pronounced, “We declare war on Islamic terrorism!”  Hip, hip, hooray!

The news also said how France was mobilizing extra security forces, just so the crowd of people could gather.  Without that security, the people would be giving the Islamic terrorists a free shot at a ready-made hostage scenario – all those innocent lambs in one area, standing so close together.  Baa.  If anyone fired a shot while that mass meeting was going on, thousands would die in a stampede, I imagine.  Add in the possibility of French troops, in riot gear, shooting wildly into a crowd and the potential dead would make for a far greater tragedy than what caused the gathering.

Does anyone see the absurdity of having to provide security for peaceful demonstrations of solidarity?

In a “democracy,” where everyone is said to be free to do anything, the same freedom applies to terrorists.  The Islamic terrorists (or any “terrorist” causing panic through criminal acts) have the “right” to break every law in the book, including kidnapping, murder, extortion and even public insults, which (in America) could be deemed “hate crimes” if certain minorities were the targets.  The point is you cannot stop a crime before it becomes a criminal act.  We all have the “freedom” to plot and plan evil acts, then act based on those plans, as long as we don’t let anyone know what our thoughts are before we actually break a law.

I am reminded of the scene from the movie Monty Python and the Holy Grail, where Arthur and his knights have arrived at a French castle.  The animosity between the French and English was made laughable, by portraying the French as having an attitude of superiority.  One French soldier, high along the castle wall, yelled down at King Arthur, “I don’t want to talk to you no more, you empty-headed animal food trough wiper! I fart in your general direction! Your mother was a hamster and your father smelt of elderberries!”  Of course, by saying, “I fart in your general direction,” it is a play on the gesture of spitting.  To spit in front of someone (in his or her general proximity) is a form of body language, becoming an unspoken insult.  When words are lacking … spit in someone’s general direction.  This is more easily accomplished than farting at will.

That was the attitude of Charlie Hebdo and the cartoonist who thought nothing of Allah, nor those who pray to Allah.  The world fondly calls that “satirical comedy.”  Rather than understand how this works, as long as you are behind walls of defense and stronger than those you ridicule, you have the “right” and “freedom” to lampoon whomever you please.

This sense of superiority and devil-may-care attitude certainly applies to the French now, as this past week’s activities began with the break-in and murder of 12 people, including a cartoonist for the satirical newspaper Charlie Hebdo (“Weekly Charlie”).  Threats that had been publicly declared … a boast of revenge (which was their “freedom” of speech) … did not make the news a total surprise.  The shock comes from no longer being strong enough to prevent such acts, because the thick castle walls evaporated.  Charlie Hebdo is the reality of the metaphor of a French soldier standing aloof, behind safe walls, shouting insults to those in inferior positions; but it is not bravery that casts our epithets simply because a sense of “freedom” allows one to do that.  Regardless of rights, it becomes arrogant abuse; and when the walls come tumbling down and the playing field is leveled (a karmic debt due kind of thing), then people tend to let the shoe fit the other foot and cry, “Foul!”

Freedom of expression or hate crime?

Payback is hell.  So they say.

Shortly after the murder of the cartoonist at Charlie Hebdo occurred, I saw a headline that read, “Muslim cleric writes op-ed claiming Islam does not believe in free expression.”  Oh my God!  Why would any publisher lead with that statement?  I imagined how everyone who read that headline must have thought, “The Muslims are not believers in Democracy!”

Of course, it is easy to see how that was the plan after all; but how irresponsible is that?  It can lead some to a though process, fueled by the equivalent of an idiot basement blogger (not a professional journalist), for the promotion of anger.  Such a message is always only one reader’s flawed personality away from igniting another idiot to shout, “Let’s goes kill them all!”

If you think about what the headline said (and I did not read the article), it makes complete sense for an Islamic cleric (or Christian minister or Jewish rabbi) to say, “We understand the world gives everyone the ‘right’ to sin, but the point of our religion is to teach personal restraints against those freedoms, based on moral principles of sacrifice and a belief that a greater power will reward the faithful for not sinning.”  So, Charlie Hebdo lacked such restraints, choosing to print the cartoonists free willed art that would purposefully insult Muslims.  The IS military (ISIS) equally lacked such restraints, choosing to arm the terrorists who freely volunteered to die for revenge.  In a convoluted sense, it has to be understood that people have the “right” to misunderstand what one believes in, and if that misunderstanding leads one to go off on a verbal, visual, or even physical rampage, making fun of that belief, simply because it is not what someone else believes, then be prepared to watch the pendulum swing to and fro.  Only personal restraints can stop that back-and-forth – action, reaction.

“I spit in your general direction!”

Just like the French to shout out insults: Je suis Charlie!

“I spit back in yours!”

I believe she was arrested as a terrorist.

Democracy, by definition, is “majority rule.”  If the majority is ruled by a system of laws that match the majority’s moral standards – based on its religious or philosophical beliefs – then certainly a “right” to freely express one’s ideas should be restrained, to some degree.  If for no other reason than the majority feels a great sense of embarrassment when a minority opinion is expressed, something causing the greater whole to cringe, thinking, “Okay, you’ve gone too far.”  Yes, you have that right; but, just like farting in an enclosed space with other people near, others who could fart too, but they restrain themselves, the majority has the right to punish those who use no restraints, using “freedom” and “right” as a crutch with which to hurt people for self-satisfaction.  In a democracy, the majority should have the “right” to say to the self-unrestrained, “I slap you for farting in public, you uncivilized animal!”

In the 1970s, when The National Lampoon and the “Second City” comedy groups of Chicago and Toronto gained popularity, bleeding into Saturday Night Live, it sudden became fun to be irreverent and risqué, even gross. Monty Python’s Flying Circus was the English wave of sarcastic humor that sought to break the restraints of morals and religion.  As a minority then (under age 30 category), I took great delight in knowing comedy was rattling the cages of the establishment.  The more my elders complained, the funnier it became.  Then I grew up.  I became less amused because I could see the harm a word, gesture, or slight could cause.  I saw the wisdom of restraint; but while I changed, the ball kicked to a roll in the 70’s just picked up speed.

Don’t forget to save the gizzards for the dog!

When you open your eyes and look around today, you can see how your society has become an “in your face, I don’t care what you think, I have the right to insult anyone I want” gangland.  The minority element – the lunatic fringe – has become dissidents – rabble rousers demanding attention and changing the rules to suit their whims.  It is the proverbial “inmates running the asylum” mentality, and that should send cold chills running down your spine.  When the court system finds ways to interpret the law in support of such idiocy, punishing anyone who would reprimand that lesser view and write new laws based on majority will (i.e., abortion, gay marriage, illegal immigration, marijuana legalization, cartoons of Allah published, etc., on and on), then is ceases to be a democracy.  It becomes something unintended – something else entirely – something evil.

The wider view of what is happening in the world now is the realization of what happens when you pretend you have a democratic society, but then let democracy haters have the “right” to ruin democracy.  Our principles of freedom requires, perhaps demands that we let in all the people who are fed up with the insults the minority has the “right” to hurl.  We promote, “Come and take advantage of our system’s natural flaws, turning the system against the people you hate, because they hate you.”

The payback is just beginning.  It is the new reality program, like Saturday Night Live used to be, only it is going to be “Everyday Live.”  The promos will say, “You thought that was bad?  Just wait for the next live show.  Coming to a mall, copy store, or grocer near you!”  You have to learn to laugh at misery, including murder and violence, or else it will make you a drag on society.  It is the “new satire.”  Get it?

Nostradamus predicted this demoralized state coming, way back in 1555.  What he wrote can most clearly seen through hindsight, as far as historical specifics go, in the less than 10% of the quatrains of The Prophecies that have been fulfilled, so far.  The remaining 90+% have yet to be completely fulfilled, but they can still be understood as predicting a future in general terms.   The meaning of the generality is unmistakably clear in many of the quatrains, such that they tell of a future still to come, recognized as such because no past history matches the events stated.  In those, we know that Nostradamus predicted (prophesied) an invasion of Europe, from Eastern Europe and North Africa.  This is not my opinion, but a consensus view by those who have done serious study of what The Prophecies contain.

Rene is a nice French name.

Anyone who can put his or her hands on a copy of Rene Noorberg’s book, Nostradamus Predicts the End of the World (first printing 1982) can clearly see this.  One does not need to read any of Noorbergen’s interpretations (he said the end of the world would come in 1988, then amended that to an unspecified time before the year 2000), because all interpreters are bound to make mistakes when guessing about the future, based on present conditions (which steadily change).  You just look at the pictures.  Noorbergen put maps of Europe in his book, with arrows showing the direction of military troops flowing into Italy, France and Spain, from Eastern Europe and North Africa, and then maps showing the flow of military troops retreating back to where they came.  Since 1555, no such invasion has ever taken place, and none has ever been remotely considered a possibility … until now, when Europe has suddenly seen how well democracy is working.  Foreigners from Africa, the Middle East, and Eastern Europe have fled their countries and massed within all the nations of Western Europe.

The whole point of focus in the recent news is France is turning conservative (versus liberal).  The people are electing politicians that are now seeking to restrain the waves of Muslims into their nation.  Imagine that.  France, with all its history of colonial presence in Africa and the Middle East – the land the Ayatollah Khomeini found welcoming, as an exile – is trying to legally restrain the influence of Islam in their socialist nation!

Nostradamus clearly (to me) writes of attacks on Italy, Spain, and France, by organized and coordinated military personnel, with naval support that is well beyond what one would think the Arabs or Africans have at their disposal now, using the element of surprise as a strategy to catch all of Western Europe with its collective pants down around the ankles, completely unprepared to defend itself.  The result will be a rout, where Italy, Spain and the southern half of France will be rapidly subdued, to the point of surrender, simply to stop the warfare.  Solidarity will become the repeating of French capitulation in wars past, with signs being held up that say, “We quit!  Please don’t destroy the Eiffel Tower.”

Forget the possibilities of nuclear weapons being deployed … for now.  Just focus on France, just as that is where the recent focus has been laid.  Imagine how the French people are just like all others in the Western world, feeling a false sense of safety and security because the media regularly tells them, “We’re Number One … Again!”

We see how well the French police SWAT teams took control of one hostage crisis; but how do you think they could handle a thousand 9-1-1 calls at the same time, all saying, “They are outside and they have automatic weapons, artillery, and they are killing everyone!  Help now!”  The view presented by Nostradamus (especially in Italy) is one of utter chaos, with no “killer instinct” or real war experience countering this invasion.  “Our boys” (and girls) know video killing, not real war experience … like that going on in Syria now, Iraq, Afghanistan, Egypt, Libya and Palestine yesterday.  The picture Nostradamus paints (in many quatrains that link together) is a drop your weapons and run defense of Italy and Spain, which is like the saying, “You can run, but you sure can’t hide.”

I am reminded of another scene from the movie Monty Python and the Holy Grail, this one where Arthur and knights storm a castle, where a wedding party is going on inside.  Two guards are ceremoniously standing outside the castle door, merely to welcome guests.  They hold spears, but have no intent to ever use them.  The rush by Arthur and his knights completely destroys this “security team.”  They cut the guards to pieces, mercilessly.

You can sleep well knowing your armed forces are protecting you.

While visiting Italy a few years back, I saw military personnel in the Rome airport, holding automatic weapons, and dressed in military fatigues.  They looked the part of warrior, but are they prepared to open fire on anyone who rushes up to them?  Or, are they trained to welcome guests first, and second let any possible terrorist fire the first shot?

While you ponder that question, consider how eager you would be to begin shooting at an invasion force, should you own a weapon and see them killing at will along the beach you are wealthy enough to live near?  Who would you open fire on without permission to do so?  Perhaps one can see just how easy it would be to be caught off guard, even though it appears we have our guard up.

The emergency preparedness and training the people of the general population grasp, since we no longer go through Fallout Shelter Drills, is how to gather in public squares and light candles, lay flowers and hold signs.  Many people, for various philosophies and beliefs, do not own weapons that shoot real bullets.  So, many prefer to gather in peaceful protest, as a recourse during times of anger.  However, in a war, protesters raising sticks in the air (even if only holding signs) can be seen as threatening, leading to an exercise called shooting fish in a barrel.

Because so many in the West have shown solidarity for the “right” to insult two of the world’s major religions (Christianity and Islam), the superiority attitude can come back to haunt those of Western Europe.  While the insults have had the effect of causing one of the two to tremble in fear (Christianity), you have kicked the Muslim dog too often, for too long.  When they say, “I do not like you doing that,” by refusing to believe your stools stink at all, you will have made your bed to lie in.  Believing no one would ever think of insulting you – including Islamic terrorists – Nostradamus predicted you are wrong.  In Western Europe – in places like France – the choices for future solidarity will be limited to: “Do you opt for starvation, torture, and/or death?  Or, will you place this robe on and bow to Mecca five times a day?”

The spit will be running down your face, because of the hatred your comedy has helped deepen.

Another futuristic view where violence grows from no self-restraints – A Clockwork Orange.

There is so much left that could still be said .  There is so much I would be glad to say to serious inquirers.  There is so much that can be done to at least lessen the severity of the storm that is headed our way, which has now been brewing for decades.  Just know this: The purpose of prophecy is to prevent horrendous times ahead, not celebrate their coming.  The problems of a prophesied future can only be compounded when prophecy is ridiculed and insulted, simply because people believe they have the “right” to spit in the general direction of prophets.  To have people spit just because fewer people believe there is any reason to listen to prophets anymore is craziness.  When no one listens, the prophecy comes true.

The end.

Leave a comment

Filed under Nostradamus