Quatrain VIII-50 is said to be one of Nostradamus’ “hits” or accurate predictions of the future. Supposedly, this quatrain was fulfilled in 1573 (after Nostradamus died in 1566), when a “bastard Spanish knight took Tunis.” As far as “hits’ go, the admission that there was no “plague” anywhere around then, is just a little ‘close, but no cigar’ short of a great hit.
Let me make this clear. A PROPHECY (PROPHETIE) is NOT a prediction.
Just as Nostradamus did not predict the death of King Henry II of France in a jousting match in 1569 (would not be allowed to, by Yahweh or the Spirit of Jesus guiding his thoughts), he also did not predict anything that would be useless information.
Nostradamus did not write Les Propheties to impress people with his amazing ‘hits’ of ‘prediction.’ He wrote everything to be clearly known to be the Word of Yahweh, through His Son resurrected within the soul-flesh of Nostradamus (therefore a Saint and Prophet); so, everyone not believing Yahweh has spoken through a Prophet of His will have his/her own soul to pay the price (a luxury tax) of disbelief – eternal damnation.
Nostradamus clearly stated in his Preface (called an Epistle to Cesar) that everything he wrote was from God and Spiritually spoken to him to write. He took no credit for himself. The title also clearly states the Word of God, as it does not say “Les Prédictions.”
He had published yearly Presages, which he made clear were not the same as Prophecies, although all his Presages were likewise divinely inspired. The Presages dealt with one year’s predictions, which amazingly came true; and, that divine inspiration formed the base of followers that would keep The Prophecies forever something people talk about (but knew little of the meaning to).
The whole of his work (The Prophecies) is an epic poem (before Goethe wrote Faust and before Beowulf was discovered to have been written prior), where all the quatrains connect together as living cells, so multiple quatrains can lend a meaningful hand to understanding another (and vice versa). Reordering is essential to beginning to grasp an epic poem; but the Preface says nothing about individual ‘hits’ to be amazed by.
Therefore, some bastard Spanish knight taking Tunis in 1573 has very little (if anything serious) to do with today. However, I’m sure the Muslims of Tunis still remember those ‘good ole days,’ with a smile and a dagger hidden behind their tunics.
Quatrain VIII-50 states this in Old French:
La pestilence lentour de Capadille,
Un’autre faim pres de Sagont s’appreste.
Le cheuallier bastard de bon senille
Au grand de Thunes fera trancher la teste.
All I want to say about this quatrain is it potentially refers to Joe Biden in line three. Line one refers to a loss of a most strategic territory, which is now controlled by the British. Line two refers to the United States of America, as the “bastard knight” that will be passed the torch as the world’s defender of Christianity. The one “to sufficient him senile” says the corrupt “bastards” that pull his puppet strings are planning ole Joe to be reelected, even if brain dead (ala the Frankenstein from Pennsylvania).
As I interpreted this quatrain, visions of John’s Apocalypse streamed forth. I also saw images from Excalibur (the movie), where Arthur was incapable of acting to stop the evil that was overtaking the land (and good knights were dying trying to save Camelot without Arthur). That lack of Spirit is where the United States is now; and, that is right where the enemy wants the United States to be.
By the way, Thunes is an old slang word in French, meaning “Money” (not Tunis). The one “senile” leading the “great” to ruin will do it for “Money.” This sell-out will mean the United States will not be capable of rising to the occasion, when a most strategic territory has been lost from British control. America will be suffering from the “plague” of who knows how many millions of illegal warriors having been allowed to come into the country by then, to take advantage of a ‘senile” puppet not caring at all who gets killed, as long as he gets “Money.”
Do you dance to the money life offers? Or, do you play the tune and sing the song of truth Jesus whispers to you?
Of course, if believing this translation and interpretation means one has to live it and see it first … well. Too late then. A soul always bears its own responsibility towards Judgment. To believe in Yahweh (His name that means “I AM WHO I AM”) means to believe in the Judgment that comes to all souls. To believe in Judgment of one’s soul means to believe in a Prophet of Yahweh, as the Son reborn in flesh. Enough of what Nostradamus has written (that I have interpreted and put out for casual viewing) is enough to believe … or not.
To doubt means having none of the above. No belief in God to write Prophecy through Prophets. No belief that allowing Joe to ruin the nation that must fight for Christ (the white horseman), even if a “bastard,” means your soul will face Judgment having done nothing to fight evil (like good knights). No belief that Yahweh sent a warning that clearly says, “You are going the wrong way,” means to suffer the fate of the Ninevites, when the Prophet not named Jonah arrived saying the same thing Jonah had said.
No belief means no faith. No faith means no soul saved. No soul saved means a bad Judgment. Joe Biden is setting the world up for bad Judgment being life returned into flesh on a planet that struggles to support life in the flesh.
Just make a note that you read it first here. Stick that in your purse or wallet; so, when someone comes to scoop up your corpse (if anyone is left to do such street maintenance), they will know who was forewarned, thus forearmed.
Let me say that I fully stand behind my post about Nostradamus writing nothing about the present situation in Israel-Gaza. When I wrote that this recent event is simply another stepping stone on the road to ruin, I mean that. However, I feel the need to open some eyes to what I also wrote, about nobody winning in the end.
Nostradamus did not write anything that hints something will change and keep the End Times from playing out. There is no quatrain that says a hero comes to save the day. The ONLYhope, at this point, is self-preservation; and, by “self” I mean an individual “soul” being saved.
That will not come from some mass protest rally, where some heroic individual carries a bullhorn and a soapbox into the town square (or some busy Interstate highway during rush hour) and then makes loudly chanted demands. All that does is feed the leftist media with more fuel to throw onto a fire set to burn America (and the West) to the ground. All words of protest will fall upon deaf ears (those hanging on the sides of soulless politicians and government movers and shakers).
There seems to be some who grope for a solution to purposefully caused problems (all the billionaires who are the apex of a pyramid scheme of billionaires, all riding the backs of the poor into the sunset of the ‘American dream,’ into the ‘Brave New World’ order of the Haves (1%) and the Have-nots (99%)), as if the wrong that is the issue of Palestine can be undone by giving it back.
Sure, it was wrong to give it to the Jews. But, then, the Jews have a seat at the 1% table, just like the Saudis and Commies from Russia and China. If the answer were so simple, then giving it back would have happened long ago. The modern Israel reflects the political movers and shakers of Zionism; and, just like Soros, Obama, Biden, Gates, yada yada billionaires, they are just as corrupt as are the corrupt leaders of Israel. The wrong (Zionists) leading the wrong (innocent Jewish lambs that want to believe in Israel being theirs) are against the wrong (Iranian Muslims) leading the wrong (poor Muslims forced by religious liars to be Hamas, et al). Therefore, there is no right anywhere in this situation of events.
The actions of Hamas are wrong. Two wrongs do not make a right. It is too late to “give Israel back to the Palestinians.” What is done is done. Israel will be destroyed and the land taken back by force. Don’t let the bullets slap you in the back as you try to load up a boat to move somewhere else, in order to avoid missiles and paratroopers slapping you in the face.
Long ago, I thought: “You know, if the USA wants to give the Jews free land, let them give the Jews all the land north of the Rio Grand River (for 50 miles or so). Not much there besides cactus, sagebrush and illegals sneaking across. One thing the Jews are good at is defending their borders. Say bye-bye to the drug cartels and sex slave smugglers. If that is going to happen, then the Jewish mob will need their cut up front, just to pass through their turf. But … alas … that will never happen.
The point I want to make here, now, is this. YOUare living among foreigners who are planning to cut your collective throats, rape your women, kill your babies, and take you prisoners. There will be no hostage negotiation planned in the future. If YOUare not in danger of that, then YOU are one of the foreigners planning to do that, first chance you get.
Europe is in extreme danger because all the citizens there have been stripped of firearms. All they have to defend themselves is a cell phone. Good luck trying to guard your throat with that.
According to what Nostradamus prophesied, Italy, France (southern half), and Spain are goners. The French were given two fiefdoms to manage in 1918; and, by 1948 they released Syria and Lebanon to be self-governing. Still, they did not protest the British giving away Palestine; and, they sent loads of knights into the ‘Holy Land’ to kill non-Christians. So, old wrongs live long.
Nostradamus says the islands of the Mediterranean Sea will become like Alcatraz Island is to San Francisco. Talk about stuffing ten pounds of shit into a five pound bag (youngsters have no clue what that means), well those prison islands will not come with fancy suites and meals. The people stuffed into those islands will be eating bark from trees and grasses, while going mad starving to death … AND with NO CELL PHONES ALLOWED!!!
Americans still cling to the right to bear arms; and, in those places where American citizens take dearly to that right, the foreigners will not be as fortunate trying to cut their throats. This is why race has become an issue in America. Here, the plan is to blame the white man for everything, while making evil seem to be an innocent lamb. The Zionist Jews that formed and run the ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union) are supporting those who want to cut the throats of white Americans. Remember the bowtie boys of American Islam hate Christian whites as much as they hate American Jews; but they love the Jewish lawyers that teach them how to hate and get away with it. All of this is wrong versus wrong. Two wrongs do not make a right. Never have. Never will.
America has become overrun by corrupt politicians and “community organizers,” who have all sold their souls to indoctrinate weak minds to support their agenda, which is determined to destroy America. This is not Islam. It is Communism. Those are two natural enemies that now sell their souls like prostitutes, singing the tune “The enemy of my enemy is my friend.” The Democrat Party should all wear Soviet Union and Red Chinese flags on their lapels. Those who masquerade as Muslims (the ‘bowtie boys’) preach it is Allah’s will to have all non-Muslims murdered; and, it will be their souls paying the price for their actions. There is only one god who preaches Kill thy neighbor; and, that god is Satan.
There are nine hundred fifty quatrains (including one with a header, making it a cinquain) in The Prophecies of Nostradamus. All of them tell of this being a war between religions, those created by “New Philosophers.” This makes the absence of religion become a religion of mind worship, one that preaches its followers must bow down to the state-god and kill anyone who believes in any other gods. Nostradamus was inspired by the spirit of Jesus resurrected within him.
Nostradamus was descended from a Jew (Guy Gassonet, his grandfather), who knewJesus was the Messiah-Christ promised to the Jews. He converted to Roman Catholicism, because he was already a true Christian (an Israelite, not a Jew). He gave his wife (a Jewish woman) the option of leaving him (deportation from the Inquisition), which she took and was gone. Guy married Nostradamus’ grandmother, who most likely was a descended Jewish convert, like Guy. Guy gave up being a Gassonet, creating the name Nostredame, which is Old French for “Our lady.” “Our lady” is not Mary the mother of Jesus, but the daughter of Jesus’ son – John the Beloved – where Mary and two other Biblical Mary women (Three Marys) miraculously landed in coastal France (Jesus’ wife, Mary Magdalene, with Mary Salome, and Mary of Clopas). That daughter of John would become the ‘Holy Grail’ for true European Christianity, meaning Guy Gassonet was descended from the blood of that ‘Holy Blood.’
So, Yahweh spoke to Nostradamus through His Son Jesus being within him (making him be reborn from above in that name that says “YAH Saves”). This makes The Prophecies be as Christian as any book in the New Testament. It makes it as Israelite as any book in the Old Testament. All books of the Holy Bible were written by true Prophets, not men (mere men do the translations into other languages … wrongly).
Tell me why there isn’t some man known from writing such a work that was Chinese Communist, Soviet Communist, Persian Shite Muslim, or Arabian Sunni Muslim. The answer is true Prophecy cannot come from false gods; and, certainly not man (without Yahweh’s guidance). I hear the fools that murdered innocent people on September 11, 2001 were told they would each get seventy-two virgins when they reached Paradise.
Come on! Souls are eternal. There are no sex organs on souls. They cannotreproduce. They have no need for virgins to rape in Paradise.
Only Yahweh makes souls. Souls after death become like Barbie and Ken dolls (well Ken, no souls are feminine, so all are the Son … if saved). Souls-spirits-angels penetrate, thus are masculine essence. Flesh is the matter of the universe, which is lifelessness with its legs spread, waiting for a soul-spirit-angel to penetrate it and place life into a corpse. Every spirit-angel-soul in “Paradise” (it is better called Heaven) that departs a corpse at death is then a virgin, made pure by the lack of a filthy dirty dirtbag called a sinful body of flesh. That purity for sinner souls is only temporary, because Yahweh does not reward murderers with eternal “Paradise.”
Just like when you graduated from the first grade and the principle shook your hand and said, “Welcome new second grader!” souls go through a series of incarnations, before they have learned two wrongs do not make a right. To reach the ultimate graduation day, one’s soul must have mastered righteousness. The only wayto do that is to have Jesus be one’s Master and Lord within, like Nostradamus had. Righteousness means having a divinely possessing Angel keep your flesh a reborn virgin, before death releases it for Judgment.
The souls in need of punishment stand before Yahweh’s throne like cold, wet Chihuahuas, waiting for Yahweh to tell those souls, “Tsk tsk tsk. Last time we met you promised to change your wicked ways. Now look at you. I think for the immoral act of premeditated mass murder, you should spend eternity alone in darkness.”
Souls are more hairless than a shivering cold chihuahua
Of course, Yahweh asks the condemned souls, “What do you think?” They all (being no longer with a fleshy brain) say, “You know, Yahweh.”
The purpose of true Prophecy is to elicit faiththat the Prophecy comes from Yahweh, not some false god or man. Jonah was sent to save the city-state of Nineveh, because their wicked ways would bring destruction upon them. Yahweh sent Jonah to tell them that would surely happen, if they did not change their ways.
Jonah got his panties in a wad (or his loin cloth girded too tight) and didn’t want to go, simply because he thought Yahweh was only supposed to save Israelites. When Jonah finally did what Yahweh told him to do, the leaders of Nineveh had faithin Yahweh, knowing Jonah was the lips that moved when Yahweh spoke through them. They changed their wicked ways and were spared destruction.
That made Jonah crybaby about wicked people not being punished. Then he went off into oblivion. Afterwards, the people of Nineveh returned to their wicked ways, so another true Prophet was sent to them by Yahweh. That Prophet told them the same thing Jonah had told them; but that time they did not have faith that it was Yahweh warning them. They thought it was just some crazy nut, kinda like people slander the name Nostradamus, using it as reference to someone who thinks he knows something (when they know better). The people of Nineveh did not change then; and, they were destroyed.
Jesus said Jonah was what a true Prophet is. That is because he did what Yahweh told him to do ANDpeople listened, had faith because they heard Yahweh speaking (not Jonah), so they changed; and, that saved their asses.
Nostradamus was a true Prophet like Jonah, without all the cry babying. The point isnever about the one delivering the message from Yahweh. It is always about YOU listening to what Yahweh said through His Prophecy and findingfaith, realizing that no one is capable of writing nine hundred fifty four-line verses that have an ABAB rhyme scheme, for no purpose at all. So, realizing Nostradamus must be a messenger sent from Yahweh (like Nostradamus said in his letters explaining The Prophecies) to Save souls, YOU need to change your wicked ways that are aiding and abetting the End Times.
Change begins by reading divine Scripture and taking the time to discern the truth that is hidden in the words that are The Word of Yahweh. That truth is not wholly preached in churches these days, because those doing the preaching have become hired hands. They work for political purposes and act as community organizers, leading others to hate anyone who does not think like their employers tell them to think. The time for safety in numbers is over. It is time to save yourself (your soul); but to do that you need Yahweh’s help. You need to be reborn as His Son’s soul in new flesh – yours.
This is why Yahweh did not need to tell Nostradamus to write about Hamas being innocent lambs fighting for their lost land back. He did not need to repeat the decision to give Palestine to the Jews was wrong, every time two wrongs would raise their ugly heads and break Yahweh’s Covenants. The Covenant is the divine marriage vows, which forever joins a soul with Yahweh’s Anointing Spirit, which is the soul of His Son, Jesus. Refusal to enter into that divine union means rejecting Yahweh, which is the worst wrong a soul can do. To die having blasphemed Yahweh will condemn such released souls to a Judgment for an eternity those souls will have created for themselves (their souls).
To find faith, one needs only ask, “Did you say Yahweh wrote this warning?” None of the details beyond this is needed: You have created wickedness. You must change.
The proof is easily found in just a few quatrains: the one that precisely tells of the giving away of Palestine, under the guise of “new law;” and, the ten or so that detail the events of 9/11. Requiring anything beyond that as reason for belief means a soul doubts Yahweh spoke through Nostradamus; and, doubt does not faith make.
Here is a song and video that sums us the pathetic state the world is in. At least it offers good advice: Save Yourself. You can only do that by total self-sacrifice to Yahweh and then being reborn as His Son (boys and girls alike). Then, you become a Prophet that understands the Prophecy of the Holy Bible … and The Prophecies of Nostradamus; so, you tell the world to Save Itself … until the End comes.
This is the name of the personal secretary or assistant to Michel de Nostredame, whose Latinized name was Nostradamus. Because Nostradamus died on July 2, 1566, after the final edition of his work Les Propheties (The Prophecies) and a revised edition was printed in 1568, one must be able to see that Nostradamus saw misprints in the 1566 edition (printed in Lyon, France), which needed to be corrected. That (logically) would be the only reason for a reprint to take place over a year after the author’s death.
According to the documentation about Nostradamus that is part of the lore and mystique, as to him having amazing talents few others have possessed, he told his assistant Jean de Chavigny before he went to bed that night, “I will be dead in the morning.” Sure enough, Nostradamus did not wake up the next morning. It is also documented that Nostradamus suffered from gout, which by itself is not reason for death; so, Nostradamus told his assistant his soul would be released from his body that night and Jean de Chavigny was to carry on with the plans Nostradamus had told him.
It is important to realize that Michel de Nostredame was married to Anne Ponsarde Gemelle, where the word Gemelle is a statement that she was born along with a twin. She did not die until 1581, so whatever may or may not have been shared with her by her husband of over eighteen years, to whom she had six children with Michel, is not part of the written record. The Preface that appears in every edition of Les Propheties is also referred to as the Epistle to Cesar, as it appears that Nostradamus addressed his son repeatedly, when Cesar was called an infant. Cesar Nostradamus was born in 1553, according to public record (dying in 1631).
This history that is known and can be pieced together should be seen as Michel de Nostredame being a true church, in the same was that Jesus said, “For where two or three are gathered together in my name, there am I in the midst of them.” (Matthew 18:20, KJV) This stated by Jesus means “two or three” souls in bodies of flesh are Saints, this will be due to their devotion to Yahweh (the One God over all gods) having “gathered” or “assembled together” as wife-souls of Yahweh; so, all those devoted souls will be divinely possessed by the Son Jesus (his soul-spirit), where Jesus will become the Lord of each, “in the midst of them” each. This means Michel, Jean, and Anne were all Saints in the name of Jesus. The children of them would likewise be raised to honor Yahweh and marry Him Spiritually, so each of them could also be Jesus reborn into their flesh.
Seeing this, Jean de Chavigny is a name that says, “John from Chavigny,” which is a statement about where he was born. In ancient times there was a small town name Chavigny in the Eure department, near Belgium, which later merged with the town Bailluel. Today, there is a place named Chavigny in the Meurthe-et-Moselle department, in northeastern France. One reference says the word “chavigny” means “where brooms grow.” The point to be made from this is the name Jean, as John, is a name that means “Yah Is Gracious, Yah Has Been Gracious.” It also was the name of the disciples whose brother was James, both sons of Zebedee; and it was the name of the son of Jesus, from his marriage to Mary Magdalene, who was the father of the daughter that carried the genetics of Jesus (through John the Beloved) into Gaul, around 90 A.D. This became the seed to the first true Christians in Europe, known as the Cathars. I welcome you to investigate that topic; and, I have posted a couple of articles that give more information on this website.
The son of Jesus leaned his head on his father’s shoulder. So too must all souls be Jesus reborn in flesh.
The point that I would like to make about Jean de Chavigny being the personal secretary to Nostradamus is this relationship was more (in my mind) than some guy looking for work and some other guy hiring him to do things related to the ‘business’ of writing prophecies. I believe that Jean and Michel were a pair of Saints, in the same way as Paul and Silas, as well as Paul with Luke and Timothy (et al). One does all the talking or writing, while the other fully supports that said and written. This means Jean knew the source of Michel’s divine inspiration, because he too was led by the soul of Jesus within his soul-body; and, Jean was led to follow Michel.
This is then the model presented in the New Testament, where Jesus sent out his twelve disciples in pairs, where it is written: “And he called the twelve and began to send them out two by two, and gave them authority over unclean spirits” (Mark 6:7, ESV). The misunderstood element of this is “two by two” means one pair of disciples (such as Peter and John of Zebedee), where each of the “two” has the soul of Jesus within their body of flesh, alongside their soul, as “two” souls in one body of flesh. This is what is meant when Jesus told Nicodemus, Salvation (assurance of eternal life) requires one soul be born again from above, with a second soul, one that is most holy. Thus, Michel and Jean were such a pair.
When this instruction of Jesus then had Mark write, “And he said to them, “Whenever you enter a house, stay there until you depart from there. “And if any place will not receive you and they will not listen to you, shake off the dust that is on your feet as a testimony against them.” Here, the “house” entered is the incarnation where a soul has been sent by Yahweh to animate a body of flesh. That makes a “house” a “tabernacle,” which is the ‘tent’ that covers the soul. With the holy “house” is the High Priest (Jesus), who will remain with one’s soul until death takes away that “house,” as Nostradamus told Jean de Chavingy he would “leave the house before sunrise.”
When Nostradamus and Jean lived, Rome was kind to astrologers and kings and queens, as well as their subjects, believed in prophets, even if what they prophesied was well over their heads. Now is when I have entered a “house” as a soul reborn like Jean de Chavigny, where I write to clarify what The Prophecies mean, as one sent out “two by two” (myself and my wife). Now is when I am not received and people will not listen. I have not been reborn from above to argue the benefits of eternal Salvation. All I am allowed by Jesus as my Lord to do is “shake the dust [the dead matter that is used to surround unsaved souls] that is on my feet [the lowest part of the human body and the part that must trod upon dead matter]. Thus, those who reject divine prophecy is “a testimony against them,” not me, Nostradamus, Jean de Chavigny or Yahweh.
The reason I present this website (and another) is to benefit seekers. I do not profit from this. All I have is a “staff,” which is the presence of Jesus within that keeps me walking in ministry, loving every minute. I do not earn my “bread” from selling this information. I carry “no purse” to stuff the riches of false shepherds into, like the mega-church wolves have visible hanging from their belts. The point of listening simply means a window of opportunity can be opened, if a reader takes the time and makes the effort to seek Yahweh in divine union. Being a bridesmaid to Yahweh requires some length of time proving one is totally committed to serving Yahweh for eternity. That means more than simply saying, “I believe!”
When James wrote (importantly) that “For as the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without works is dead also” (James 2:26). This means “belief” is not the same as “faith.” Belief is hearing someone one thinks is important telling one, “Do as I say.” Faith is doing what one says and knowing the truth that one has personal experience with. True Faith meaning knowing the soul of Jesus is within one’s flesh, alongside one’s soul, Acting as one’s Lord, telling one what to do, so one does that. That is the works of ministry; and one does not do any works by rubbing one’s bottom on the same wooden pew every Sunday (or an occasional Sunday). Works is being sent out “two by two” in ministry, requiring proving one’s commitment as a disciple, with some internship casting out demons (the ones that come to get one); so, one can then be deemed an Apostle. An Apostle is a Saint, which means being reborn from above in the name of Jesus.
This is a synopsis of an article that is posted on the Katrina Pearls website (no longer linked). It is an interpretation of Nostradamus’ quatrain VIII-61, which few have ventured any kind of guess that this prophecy has anything to do with modern times, much less the future.
The Old French shows:
Jamais par le decouvrement du jour Ne parviendra au signe sceptrifere Que tous ses sieges ne soient en sejour, Portant au coq don du TAG amisere.
A typical translation has been :
Never by the revelation of daylight will he attain the mark of the scepter-bearer. Until all his sieges are at rest, bringing to the Cock the gift of the armed legion.
Notice how a four-lined poem has disintegrated into two run-on sentences, arranged in four lines. Capital letters disappear in places and magically appear in others. A period shows up where none existed before. Such translations, while cherry-picking quatrains in a vacuum, as if each quatrain is separate and isolated from all the rest, leads to foolish interpretations not worth repeating.
It is actually impossible to place a written translation of any quatrain written by the hand of God – through a prophet – as the mere suggestion that this IS THE translation limits the multiplicity of meaning that God’s word has. All of the books of the Holy Bible are translated as a starting point from which deeper meaning will come. In that regard, here is a suggested jumping off point for quatrain VIII-61:
An everlasting age through him perceiving far off of the light Born will come forward in the world with the presage scepter-bearer That all his seats issuing out of may be in lingering, Carrying in the Saint Peter’s fish gift to the DAY [they will] have let go.
Now, in Nostradamus’ letter that explained The Prophecies, he wrote superlatives where the French word “tres” was added. The translators say he addressed King Henry II as the “most powerful,” “most victorious,” “most prudent,” “most wise,” “most great,” “most high,” and “most peaceful.” Unfortunately, King Henry II was a mere mortal (royal as he was), and all of those superlatives must be seen as references to God. Likewise, in the first line of quatrain VIII-61, one must see “An everlasting age” (from Jamais, meaning “Ever, A mighty while, or A very long time”) is a timeframe only possible for God to attain. The capitalization of Jamais adds to that conclusion. Seeing the article “le” as the masculine pronoun “him” (rather than simply “the”) allows the main theme to address God the Father, whose “discerning” began with the Creation. Thus “of the light,” where “light” is a use of “day,” seeing the multiplicity of “from the day,” this points to the seventh “day,” the one blessed and made holy by God. God created the “light” that would be seeded upon earth, through Adam – the Son of God descended.
This then leads to the “Birth” of a lineage of religious priests who would faithfully serve the One God. Again, capitalization of Ne (read as Né, the masculine form for matters relating to “Birth”), this relates to an important one “Raised.” The story (or saga) of that lineage IS the totality of the Holy Bible. The New Testament tells of the Messiah – prophesied in the Old Testament – being “Born,” as the one foretold who would “come forward in the world,” as the one who “will attain,” being the one “marked” or “prophesied” to come as the “king” (the “scepter-bearer”) of the Jews. Therefore, line two’s secondary theme is focused on the presence of Jesus Christ in the world.
Jesus becomes King over one’s soul-flesh, making the scepter he holds being ones brain. As Lord within, he commands and one Acts.
From line two our eyes are led to an important “That,” which reflects back on the “scepter-bearer” – Christ the King – whose presence remains on the earthly plane through “all” whose lives have been devoted as “his.” Their sacrifice of self-ego opens their hearts to God and their minds to Christ, such that their physical bodies become the “seats” for the Holy Spirit to “reside.” These are the Apostles who are reborn, thus Jesus is again “issuing out of” those bodies that are unrecognizable as Jesus of Nazareth, as unrecognizable as was the spirit of Jesus who walked the road to Emmaus with relatives of Jesus of Nazareth, without them once seeing a body filled with the same spirit. Thus, line three becomes the presence of God the Father and Christ the Son in those who receive the Holy Spirit. This means Nostradamus (as a prophet of God) has stated the process of the Trinity – Father, Son and Holy Spirit.
Line four then becomes a statement about how the Trinity remains on the earthly plane. It is not by God’s will, but by the sacrifices of those who are transformed from disciples to Apostles. It is they who are “Carrying” or “Bringing” the presence of God and Christ to others, spreading the Gospel that Jesus still lives. This is the story of the Temple Tax, from Matthew 17, where Jesus told Peter to catch a tilapia (“coq”) and take two shekels from its mouth to pay the tax for the two of them. That payment is the sacrifice Christians make for others, so they are given the “gift” of the Holy Spirit, for the purpose of “giving” it to those seeking salvation. This sacrifice or Temple Tax for being the “seat” of God must continue until the “DAY” of Reckoning, when they may “give up” their mortal bodies and find “An everlasting age” with God.
Still, the multiplicity of God’s words allows one to see that wonderful sermon just expressed about Salvation transform into the reality of today, where the world is headed towards ruin and “Armageddon.” The combination of “Jamais” (in line one) and “Ne” (in line two) turn “An everlasting age” in “Never,” such that “Never will mortals see the light of Jesus.” This means nothing “will come” and no one “will attain” the “sign” ruled by Jupiter (the scepter-bearer of Roman mythology). Jupiter rules over Sagittarius and Pisces, both signs of religious worship – dogmatic and ordered, as well as faithful and psychic. Without the people becoming the “seats” of Christ, that role will be left up to men who sit on thrones of power, in temporary “residences” as holy men. They will be like the Vatican rulers who led Martin Luther to protest the indulgences of Temple taxes, designed to build opulent buildings at the expense of men’s souls. This mismanagement by priests, scribes, and holy leaders focused on worldly things, will cause the “DAY” when all “will be lost.”
This alternate interpretation is how Nostradamus wrote in his Preface about the future being brought about by changing times, when the leaders of society – reigns, sects, & religions – will become opposite in nature, diametrically. The two versions show us the present and future, one with failure as the result, but one with salvation as the result. While it may be too late to save the world, it is not too late to save one soul – yours.
Again, this is a synopsis of a much deeper interpretation that once was found at my website, since retired. It is listed as “Interpreting Quatrain VIII-61,” with the subtitle “Nostradamus and the Trinity.”
Note: Let me add that this one quatrain is not the only reference Nostradamus made to the Trinity in the quatrains and letters. In the Epistle to Henry II (King of France) there are found split in two parts of that letter what seems to be some ramblings about the lineage from Adam to Jesus. What that lists are Saints, each of which was the embodiment of a Trinity – Father pouring out His Spirit upon a soul in flesh, Son being reborn within that soul in flesh, and a Sacred (Saintly) Spirit that is the soul in flesh married to Yahweh and reborn in the name of the Son Jesus. Jesus was a Trinity but so too was Moses, Aaron, Joshua, Samuel, David, Elijah, Elisha, Ruth, Esther, and all the first Christians (including three Marys). In the quatrains the number “three” can be read in that light of meaning, where a Trinity is divine possession by Jesus and a trinity (lower-case) is a demonic possession (Satan, evil spirit, terrible person as one). The number “three” is written fifty times in the quatrains, with ten capitalized (Trois) and forty in the lower-case (trois). Still, multiple additional meanings can come from that number, meaning there is a spiritual drive and an outer manifestation.
While I alluded to this somewhat in the article I posted prior, let me just preface that argument can only be valid if it follows the rules of Logic. I capitalize that because Logic is the cornerstone of all philosophy, and from philosophy comes mathematics. When one wants to argue a ‘dead poet’ (and the quatrains of The Prophecies are 4-line ABAB rhyme scheme poems), a poem or the lyrics of a song can seem to be many things to different people. Logic says ask the question: What did the poet say he or she meant? That is Logical. Nostradamus did that when he wrote his Preface and his Epistle to Henry II (King of France). Therefore (ergo), to say, “Nostradamus meant this,” one must then support that claim by adding, “He wrote that in his Preface (or Epistle to Henry).” With that said …
—–
I did an Internet search this afternoon of the name “Nostradamus.” Of course, many pages came up. I went through about 14 pages, clicking on some of the articles with the more interesting headings, such as, “Did God send the world Nostradamus?” and, “Quack Prophet.” I looked for some articles that went into some detail about why to believe in Nostradamus, or why not to believe. All that I read presented a case for not believing.
As I read these explanations why not to believe Nostradamus, I sensed people needing to influence others how foolish it would be to believe in Nostradamus. The articles were rather detailed, presenting what appeared to be well thought out examinations of the facts others had presented as reason to believe. Their bias made their reasoning against belief in Nostradamus very clear. All articles presented the standard arguments that it is humanly impossible to know the future, meaning that Nostradamus must have used some of the common tricks used by charlatans. Some articles were designed to save Christians from being misled by a false prophet.
From those differing perspectives, quite a few addressed why quatrain I-35 was wrong. In that quatrain, Nostradamus supposedly predicted the jousting accident of France’s king, Henry II. Every one of those articles I read agreed that Nostradamus did not predict that event. However, none of them explained that Nostradamus never claimed to have predicted that event; they all simply explained how the details of the verbiage did not fit the details of the historical event.
I was moved to post some comments on one of the articles, just to make it known that Nostradamus never made the claim that quatrain I-35 was about King Henry II dying at a joust. That event was nothing more than a sad freak accident. If a prophet had been warned of such a happening, it would have been accompanied by a divine command, “Go now and save your king.” Just because Queen Catherine de Medici began telling the world, “Nostradamus is a true prophet because quatrain I-35 is about my husband Henry’s death,” the world has maintained her interpretation as truth. Because Nostradamus did not go public and denounce that interpretation, there is no reason to show as fact that Nostradamus predicted that event. Catherine de Medici started a rumor, which is hearsay and not admissible in a court of logical debate.
Catherine de Medici was a strong supporter of Nostradamus, making him her Counselor and Physician-in-Ordinary
In my comments on that one website, I pointed out that logic demands that one use as evidence some words that Nostradamus put in writing, where he officially claimed the meaning of his work, The Prophecies. He did that in two letters that accompany the “complete” versions of that book. He explained what the quatrains meant collectively, without making any statements like, “Quatrain I-01 is about ….” Thus, it is illogical to argue against the meaning of any individual quatrains, because Nostradamus never explained individual quatrains.
One can explain the meaning of one quatrain by supporting interpretative claims about the meaning of that text. Factual evidence can be as simple as stating the definition of the words written, with that meaning guiding the interpretation. Still, an interpretation is a guess and opinion until one states as evidence something akin to a statement like, “One can assume this interpretation because Nostradamus explained this generally in his letter ….” No articles that I read did anything more than expose the foolishness of some idiot interpreting individual quatrains from The Prophecies, without knowing a damn thing about Nostradamus’ explanation of the meaning of his work.
What angered me most, while reading those Internet condemnations of Nostradamus, were the “evangelicals” who shot flurries of biblical arrows into the air as proof that Nostradamus was most certainly a “false prophet.” While those articles showed some human being playing God by flexing his scripture memorization abilities, not one addressed what Nostradamus clearly stated in his letters, as to how he was able to prophesy. They condemned him for being wrong about his predictions in individual quatrains (thus false prophecy) and they condemned him for being an “occultist,” because he used astrology to calculate his predictions.
Nostradamus stated that his source was not astrology. Perhaps his words about “astronomics” and “astrology” were not as clearly organized as were others that stated his source, but he never explained that he wrote The Prophecies because he used that art form. To draw a conclusion that Nostradamus was a false prophet, because he used astrology, only proves the “false prophesying” going on is by the evangelical writers who falsely reject anyone who states he or she is a true Prophet of the LORD. Blinded by the thrill of self-importance, an evangelical writing without facts, or without testing the facts that are present for falseness, is doing nothing but attempting to distract Christians from a real, true prophecy. After all, the real “false prophets” are the ones who love to make money from people who read their false condemnations of others. That is especially “easy money” when the condemned are dead and cannot sue them for slander.
For that reason alone, I went through the letter of preface and came up with the following statements made by Nostradamus, each prefacing his work. To those who do not understand the word “preface,” it is a document usually written by the author of a book, which explains the scope, intention, and expectations of the book being prefaced. With that known, read the words of Nostradamus and let me know what you think Nostradamus said about his source. Tell me what you think is “occultist” about his statements.
To preface this presentation, everything following is my translation, maintaining the exact word order as the original Old French (as published in the 1568 Lyon edition). This literal translation is not the only translation possible; as many words have acceptable alternate translations (what one would call synonyms). Each segment presented is shown in the order of appearance within the preface, although there is other text to be found between these statements. The double return represents where that other text would be found. (I recommend reading the whole preface, but read this first.)
One can benefit by realizing the systemic use of punctuation. Rather than present these snippets from the preface as the continuous text they appear to be in the actual preface letter, I will use punctuation to separate the words into segments, creating a poetic style. It also acts as a “speed bump,” design to slow reading down. But, the line format makes the letter match the presentations made in the quatrains (4-line poems). It will also be helpful to NOT read an ampersand as a mark simply indicating the word “and.” An ampersand is a mark that makes the statement, “what follows next is important.” Like punctuation, the ampersand symbol will be used to separate text into line format.
Any comments that I add, within the flow of text from the preface, will be bracketed. Words found in parentheses are alternative translations. The italicized words represent the Latin text of Nostradamus; and they correlate to Biblical text. The Latin does not represent direct quotes from the Holy Bible, but are more like paraphrases. Again, reading Nostradamus is best when reading one word at a time, letting images flow from each word, such that there are no “paraphrases,” per se, because that would imply standard sentence structure and syntax. I will place certain keywords in bold, to show how words repeat. Repeating words denote important themes.
The Old French text will not be presented in this posting, as that would make the eyes of typical blog readers weary and unable to maintain focus. A separate post will be made public later, which will only be to show the Old French text. It is my opinion that the 1568 Lyon edition is the edited and correct publication to use, in lieu of an actual manuscript.
From the Preface to The Prophecies:
& that the whole is royal
& guided by the power of God invaluable,
Considering also the maxim of the true Savior:
Be unwilling holy to give dogs,
not to send all pearls before swine,
lest trampled under foot
& to turn around to break apart you.
to the Prophecies:
by the medium of God immortal,
& the good Angels had received the spirit of making predictions of the future,
[the capitalized “Propheties” is to be seen as a distinction between the lower case “vaticinations” – “predictions of the future – which were Nostradamus’ publications prior to The Prophecies]
As for us who amounts humans not powerful ones anything of our natural cognizance
& tendency to machine,
to know the secrets abstracts of God the Creator
Because not is ours to know times,
and not to warn,
& etc.
that God the creator has required to reveal by imaginative impressions,
some secrets of then to become,
Because these works devine ones,
that totally are absolute ones,
God these came to perfect:
There competent who is in the center,
those Angels then third them malicious.
[The reference to “third malicious” is to the followers of the Fallen Angel, Lucifer.]
but what all will proceed from the power divine of the great God eternal,
to who all kindness proceeded.
And for becoming that the Prophet,
fairly the perfected wisdom of the prophecy him to appear manifesting the things divine ones,
like humans,
that these not themselves powered to make,
seen them effect ones of the future prediction itself extended far,
For the secrets of God incomprehensible,
but the perfected the causes summaries not itself ability to acquire without those divine inspirations:
want that all inspirational prophetic received absorbing its main principle changing from God the creator,
I yourself implore that never you not view them to use your understanding in such to succeed
& vanities that dried the bodies
& putting in ruin the soul,
giving trouble to the weak sense:
same the vanity of the more that detestable magic reprobate in times past by the sacred scriptures,
& by the divine canons,
reluctant long the fantastic ones imaginations which will become,
limiting the particularity of the places,
by divine inspiration supernatural:
& by the spirit of prophecy: [This can also state “the spirit to prophecy,” indicating it is a prophecy of the Holy Spirit.]
not that I myself view it to award nomination not effect prophetic,
but by revealed inspiration,
which are comprised ones with the understanding of this one inspired which prophesy,
the one is that came in to infuse,
brightening the light supernaturally,
to the person who predicted by the doctrine of the Stars [i.e.: Astrology]
& prophesy by inspired revelation,
which is one certain participation with the divine eternity,
in return for the Prophet lived at to judge from that that his divine spirit he to given by the medium of God the creator,
also any ones faith ones God the creator through ministers of his messengers of fire in flame epistle sent (or “missive”) came from to declare in them sense outward ones principally with nose eyes,
them causes of future prediction significators (those who read signs) to the case future,
which they owe to the one who presage to manifest.
Because the presage which oneself made from the illumination outward came infallibly in to award party with them
& working the light outward:
how truly that the party who seemed to have by the eye understanding,
this that not is through the harm to be predicted by reason of inspiration from divinity,
For the mercy of God not will be point scattered one time,
& the term prefixed,
that humans after coming ones,
will be seeing knowing ones the adventures happened infallibly,
Praying to the God immortal,
that he you wanting to lend life,
long,
in good
& prosperous happiness.
Okay. I saw a theme there, one which said, “God is the author of The Prophecies, and all I did was hold the pen on paper.” Did anyone else see the same? Guess what? If you want to know what the quatrains say, and if you want to know how to read the quatrains so you will see what they say, read the preface and the explanation letter to Henry II. It is all there.
Oh, by the way. Nostradamus makes sure that if you miss the God element of the preface, he repeated it several times in his explanation letter.
See this as pearls before swine and see how well that fits around the necks of televangelists who get wealthy doing nothing for the flock.
In the Renaissance it became popular for Europeans to assume Latin names. Because Latin was the official language of the Roman Catholic Church, there can be some who combined the advancements in human knowledge (more a return to classical times when knowledge had prevailed) with the presumed power and influence shown in papal name changes. A common aspect (in a male dominated world) was to add a –us ending to one’s name.
The whole name of Nostradamus was Michel de Nostredame. So, it was a simple task to add the masculine singular ending and becoming known as Nostradamus. This means understanding de Nostredame is important.
Nostredame is a combined name, coming from Nostre+dame. In Old French, nostre is the same as the modern French spelling of notre. The form nostra is the future tense of nostre, as “will be ours.” All these words bear the pronoun translation “our.” The French word dame (Old and modern) means “lady.” This means Michel de Nostredame was actually named Michael of Our Lady; but, as Nostradamus, it became a statement for the future, saying “One will be of [in honor of] Our Lady.”
Typically, when someone’s last name (one’s specific identifier) in France includes “de,” then that person is identified as having been born in a place. A name like de Nostredame gives the impression that there was a place in France named Nostredame. There is no such place. However, there are many churches in France that bear that name.
In a search of how many churches are in France that bear the name “Our Lady” (Notre Dame), Google returned this at the top of the search page: “Officially known as the Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Chartres, it’s one of more than a hundred churches dedicated to “Our Lady” (“Notre Dame”) scattered around France – and, like Paris’ Notre-Dame, Chartres’ also experienced a harrowing fire.” (From an article taken from USA Today, about the fire at the Gothic cathedral of that name.) This makes understanding how the father of Nostradamus took on that name.
Nostradamus’ father was named Jaume de Nostredame, with his grandfather being the source of that ‘last name.’ Nostradamus’ grandfather was born Guy Gassonet. Relative to that change of names, the website Geni.com writes:
“Grandfather of Nostradamus.
Guy Gassonet, had converted to Catholicism around 1455, taking the Christian name “Pierre” and the surname “Nostredame” (the latter apparently from the saint’s day on which his conversion was solemnized).
Gassonet was a court physician and Kabbalist who descended from a long line of rabbinical scholars. He was influential in his grandson’s education, participating in Michel Nostradamus’ teaching, which included knowledge in medicine and herbal folk remedies, as well as the “forbidden arts of Kabbalah and alchemy.”
While this information presents the guess, “apparently from the saint’s day on which his conversion was solemnized,” that presumes Guy Gassonet went down to some local clerical name change office, signed some papers, and then someone asked, “What day is this?” Someone then answered, “Oh, its the day of the Feast for Saint Mary, mother of our Lord Jesus Christ.” I do not believe that is how it happened.
I believe a better way of seeing how Guy Gassonet officially changed his name to Pierre de Nostredame, was from realizing forethought on the matter. Preparations beforehand would have scheduled an affair to make it official, to be held in a cathedral named for Our Lady AND also possibly scheduled to be held on the day of her feast [Assumption Day is August 15]. Still, that urges one to ask, “Why choose that name?”
Guy Gassonet was stated to have been a “Kabbalist who descended from a long line of rabbinical scholars.” That says he was Jewish by religious tenets. His “conversion to Catholicism” was due to the Papal-led Episcopal [Bishop jurisdiction] Inquisitions that first took place in southern France in the twelfth century.
By 1455 (the fifteenth century), there had been a slow, methodical history of persecution that focused on the presence of Moors (Spanish Muslims) and Jews within Christendom. This included the genocide of the Cathars (between the thirteenth and early fourteenth century) and the execution of Joan of Arc (May 30, 1431). Between 1309 and 1376, due to the rise of a hostile political environment in Rome, the papacy was moved to southern France [Palace de Papes in Avignon]. Antipopes remained in Avignon (Provence region of southern France) until 1403. All of this unsettled control by the Papacy was what led to this conversion, as the twelfth through the fifteenth centuries was when the Church of Rome discovered how far it could go in persecuting disbelievers of their form of religion. The French Inquisitions [the Cathar extermination, known as the Albigensian Crusade] became the Church’s first attempts to exert forceful restraints on the population; with the successes in France leading to the harsher Spanish Inquisitions (1492 advent).
The aspect of this history then focuses on the Cathars, which was a name given to people that were Gnostic Jews who settled in southwestern France (the region surrounding Toulouse, extending east to northern Italy) in the twelfth century. The Greek root for “Cathar” is “katharsis,” which means “purification” or “cleansing” or “clarification.” It was other Catholics in the region that gave the Cathars that name. The Cathar people were hard working, known as weavers, and for nearly one hundred years southwestern France flourished like it never had before, nor would again after their extermination called for by Rome. It is most likely that Guy Gassonet was a remnant of this heritage that survived the carnage.
The story told of Guy Gassonet is that he was married when he was forced to convert to Catholicism or be expelled from France. As he was already a true Christian (rather than the false breed created by Rome), he chose to remain in France and comply with the recognition as a Christian, rather than remain segregated as a Jew. His wife, as a Jewish woman, refused to convert; so, their marriage was annulled. There is just reason for her decision.
A Jew is born to all Jewish women. Even if a Jewish woman marries a man of another religious faith, the child of such a mixed marriage is always born a Jew because of the mother being Jewish. The Jewish mother takes up the responsibility of teaching the child what it means to be a Jew. For a Jewish woman to deny her birth religion was sacrilegious and not something Guy Gassonet’s wife chose to do; and, it should be assumed that she too was descended from Cathar blood, who were Gnostic Jews that died by the sword, rather than convert. Therefore, she and Guy Gassonet divorced, with him marrying a second wife that was Christian by birth (Nostradamus’ grandmother).
Still, acceptance of this “theory” demands one understand why the Cathar people suddenly arrived in southwestern France in the twelfth century, after having lived as Christian Jews for some length of time in the regions now known as Armenia (southern and eastern Turkey, southern Georgia, western Azerbaijan, and northeastern Persia). To this day a pilgrimage of “gypsies” or “Roma” travel from the Bulgaria region (and other places in Europe) to attend the shrine of Saintes-Maries-de-la-Mer in the Camargue area of the Rhone River. It is this history that gives rise to a new concept of “Our Lady.”
The lore of Saintes-Maries-de-la-Mer says that a rudderless raft, set sail in Egypt and containing Mary Magdalene, Mary Solome, and Mary Jacobe, along with some male servants [all Apostles of Christ] landed safely in the Camargue. Some say there was no sail also. In a direct route [taking them past the toe of Italy and between the islands to the west of the Italian mainland] they would have traveled over 1,400 nautical miles.
With them was a child named Sara. Some say she was an Egyptian servant girl (perhaps twelve), but others say she was less than a year old. The child’s complexion was dark skinned (thus thought to be Egyptian), so she is called Black Sara or the Black Madonna. This child is believed to be the source of the Holy Blood of Christ (Holy Blood, Holy Grail), who is the Patron Saint of the pilgrims who regularly attend celebrations in her honor and also the Marys’ who landed with her. Those celebrations are held twice annually, in May and again in August each year.
It is my opinion that John the Beloved (the Gospel writer, the writer of epistles, and the writer of The Apocalypse) was the son of Jesus, born of Mary Magdalene (the wife of Jesus). John then married in Egypt [an Essene wedding] and his wife [an Egyptian Jew] gave birth to their daughter, whom they named Sara. It would have then been John’s wife AND daughter named Sara that were on board the raft, which was sent out with the plan being it would sink, killing all on board. It was then a miracle it made it to coastal France; and, it was from that seed being planted there that the Cathars arose, with Guy Gassonet being a direct descendant of Sara.
This means it was a hidden and purposeful choice for his new name, such that “of Our lady” (de Nostredame) was not the same as the Catholic distinction of Mother Mary as “Our Lady.” While also honoring the mother of Jesus by association, the hidden truth is “Our lady” was Saint Sara. The word “sara” is Hebrew, meaning “ruling body,” as a noun from the verb “sharar,” meaning “to retain liquidity.” [Abarim Publications] The aspect of “liquidity” should be seen in terms of holy blood, representing the retention of a most holy bloodline. The Hebrew noun is the root for the names “Sarai” and “Sarah,” which both bear the meaning “Princess.” A princess must be understood to be the daughter of a king, thus of royal blood.
In addition to seeing the importance of name meanings here, it is worthwhile to realize that the name chosen to replace “Guy” is “Pierre,” which is French for “Stone,” while also is the French version of “Peter.” Simon the disciple was named “Peter” by Jesus, with Matthew writing in the Greek “Petros,” and John writing in Aramaic “Cephas.” All of the above brings about a name meaning “Rock,” as the cornerstone upon which a human ‘church’ is built. The “Rock” becomes synonymous with being reborn as Jesus Christ. As such, this means Guy Gassonet took a name that loudly made the statement, “I am a Rock of Our lady,” who was the “Princess of Jesus Christ.” This should be seen as going along with Guy Gassonet being “a court physician and Kabbalist who descended from a long line of rabbinical scholars.”
Additionally, the name Michel is the French spelling of the name Michael. Michael is the name of an archangel that is mentioned in the Holy Bible’s Old Testament three times, all in the Book of Daniel. According to the Wikipedia article “Michael (archangel),” Daniel has a “vision of an angel who identifies Michael as the protector of Israelites.” Then, “Daniel is informed that Michael will arise during the “time of the end.” Nostradamus is known for writing The Prophecies that illuminate the End Times. He did not do that without divine assistance (holy leadership).
The article on Michael then says, “The Book of Revelation (12:7-9) describes a war in heaven in which Michael, being stronger, defeats Satan. ” In the Epistle of Jude, “Michael is referred to as an “archangel” when he again confronts Satan.” These mentions of Michael force one to then look at the Hebrew meaning of the name, which is “Who Is Like God?” or “Who Is Like Unto God?” Only one who is or becomes the arm of God can both confront and defeat Satan.
This then becomes a strong indication that Miched de Nostradamus was named by his father Jaume [a French version of James, meaning “He Who Closely Follows” or “Supplanter” – aka Jacob] to be representative of one filled with God’s Holy Spirit, thus one “Who Is Like Unto God.” James was also the name of a brother of Jesus, which becomes a statement made by Pierre de Nostradamus that his son would supplant him and represent the brotherhood that all Apostles of Christ represent.
As should be seen from all of this analysis, nothing about Nostradamus says he was anything less than a Saint, one who was led to write a Holy book that requires one to also be filled with the Holy Spirit to understand. When that time for divine understanding comes, the end times will be at hand.
Nostradamus Blog 